To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 2 10:16:25 +0000 2008 ------- @mba: [q]I understand that users might get back after searching. Here we find only the "replace all" case but why should we stop there? Wouldn't it be useful to have the same functionality for "replace" or "find"?[/q] No. You can assume that if a user clicks Find, he/she wants the cursor to move to the found text, if any. In the case of a single replace, maybe too.[/q] [q]But how should several consecutive search/replace calls be handled? Should we go back one step only? Or should we go back immediately to the start?[/q] When a user clicks Replace all, the program executes the Replace all in the background, so the changes aren't shown as the replacing takes place - that will make the replacing a lot faster too and the cursor location won't change either. If you need a cursor to perform each replace, then use a dummy cursor. You should only redraw the text area when it gets focus again (sorry for the Delphi jargon). ;) Hope this helps. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
