To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=19291
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 11:02:55 +0000 2008 ------- >The only additional functionality in StarOffice was that it could rearrange the windows to be in the same task window. That's all we ask. >But as this was possible only at a cost (lost system integration) that was removed in OpenOffice.org. I never detected any "lost system integretation", and I persume none of us would care. >For 3.0 we chose two features we considered to be more important: improved "notes" and multiple page view. I admit those would be features, but on what grounds did you consider those more important than repairing the damage you have done by removing split document view? Do those features have more votes? Btw., there are rumours Sun's OOo team has a tradition of rejecting any major patches from other people or companies (like IBM, Novell, ...). If those rumours are true it's clear why there is a lack of resources. No offences, I'm just forwarding street talk. And yes, I know, I shall feel free to (re)implement the demanded feature myself ;-)) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
