To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89811
User kohei changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'ka' |'aw,ka'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 13:40:51 +0000
2008 -------
kohei->aw: All uses of SFX_NOTIFY will get expanded to Notify no matter what
module it is used. So your fear is not warranted.
I just check the exported symbols of libsvxli.so (svxmi.dll on windows), and
there is no SFX_NOTIFY symbols exported, but all symbols are exported as Notify.
This is expected because that's what macro is supposed to do (to be expanded
before it gets compiled). I've also checked with all .so files but none of them
export SFX_NOTIFY symbols.
>What speaks against one CWS and doing it completely (and encapsulated) in one
step there? I would clearly prefer that.
It's the enormous overhead that a CWS incurs. For a feature inclusion or a
collection of bugfixes I wouldn't mind that overhead. But for something as
simple as this that's an overkill. So I thought it would be much simpler to
just ask the respective module owner to include the change in their respective
CWS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
