To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74754
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 11:02:41 +0000 2008 ------- I changed the signature of the hasGlyphs() method after I had some discussion with SB. I don't remember if I discussed this change also with HDU, but obviously I didn't. The reason for this change was a general problem we have with the representation of glyphs. A glyph consists of one ore more multibyte characters which are displayed as one symbol. HDU may correct me if I'm wrong, I'm no expert here. In VCL the OutputDevice::HasGlyphs() method uses indices of type xub_StrLen, which refer to the number of characters, but not the number of glyphs. This may change in the future. If I would have used indices also for the UNO API method, it won't be possible to change the semantics of an index. Therefore SB asked me, if those indices are really necessary. And the answer was no, for the problem to solve those indices were not necessary. Therefore the decision was to have rather a stable than flexible method. But all this doesn't mean that this cannot be changed for OOo 3.0. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
