To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89686
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 6 12:41:47 +0000 2008 ------- Thanks for making the changes. You should also fill in the license and license_URL fields. But the LGPL is still fairly problematic with fonts especially wrt. the embedding problems. It's really not designed with fonts in mind. A PDF document containing elements of a font under LGPL is more of a Combined Works than an aggregate. I don't think we want to force users redistributing that PDF to have to be subject to LGPL 4d0 or 4d1 (conveying Minimal Corresponding Source and Corresponding Application Code // conveying Corresponding Source or installation information). IMHO you really need a font-specific exception to deal with that or as suggested earlier a font-specific license which deals explicitly with embedding and does not influence the license of the resulting document like the OFL (wich is FSF-validated and widely used for fonts). Choosing the OFL would also permit taking in the extra symbols from other open fonts like Marvosym: http://www.marvosym.com/ and enrich the symbols offering for OOo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
