To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90759
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 10:13:55 +0000 2008 ------- Thanks, Leonard It's difficult to see exactly what R is calculating. I've tried to go back to basics to show that there is some logic/validity to Excel's method, and indeed that there is a clear bug with Calc, with the 3 parameter version. I've tried to get z.test to work in R but failed after a brief struggle. What happens if you set alternative (Direction of the alternative hypothesis) to 'greater', or 'less' or even 'two.sided'? I think Excel produces a 'one-sided' (not 'one-tailed') test which might correspond to 'greater'. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
