To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
User mav changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|STARTED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |FIXED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 00:02:49 -0800
2005 -------
There is no real file handle leak. In OOo1.1.x the persistence of the document
was controlled in one central place and in OOo2.0 it is spread through modules
that communicate between each other through UNO. Streams are used to transport
information so some streams live longer in OOo2.0. This is why the problem
appeared for this document only in OOo2.0. The introduced fix let OOo2.0 use
file handles at least so effective as OOo1.1.x does.
But since the general approach used in both versions still allows to have
problems theoretically ( even if there is still no explicit scenario ), I tend
to think that it might make sence to introduce a new temporary medium that would
allow to avoid using of separated temporary files in this area. I have submitted
a new issue 46454 for this reason.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
