To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45918
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 08:47:13 -0800 2005 ------- dvo->sseppala: On issue 34602: That fix is indeed in a CWS that was postponed early on, and thus will not be integrated into the main line. However, all relevant fixes should have been duplicated into other CWS that are being integrated into the main line. There have been a number of problems in that particular area, which are a bit difficult to tell apart without examination. Of particular interest to you is probably i43910. This fix was integrated into m90; in your m87 this would still be broken. Technically speaking, I cannot see any connection between i34602 and this one. Index marks and outline numbering are very different; they are rather unlikely to share any defects. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
