To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 14:46:40 +0000 2008 ------- fs->rene: Let's please stick to facts: > and that you didn't even check whether the fix which claimed to fix this issue > was correct). I already said that the bug as such is accepted to be a bug, which implies the claimed fix is not a fix. That's not the point here. > I am completely aware that Sun doesn't care about legal issues Discussing on this level won't help us here. That's the first time that legal issues are mentioned in this issue. I was/am not aware that the current situation *is* a legal problem, so sorry for my ignorance. All I can read here did not give me an idea about this. So, you or somebody else please *argue* why this should be a 3.0.1, instead of throwing around ridiculous (sorry) accusations. Until then, I won't accept members of my team being put under pressure with an issue whose importance is simply not clear to me from the re/sources I have. If it is, then I will. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
