To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509


User fs changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|86509,88888               |88888
                      is|                          |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     IssuesThisDependsOn|86509                     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec  8 17:08:10 +0000 
2008 -------
> and I'd add:
>  - add --with-system-cppunit if possible (but that can be done later)

Okay, but I really would like to separate this out, as is the move to a more
recent cppunit version. At the moment, I'd really like to concentrate on getting
the necessary things in for 3.0.1.
Does there already exist an issue requesting this configure switch?

(How did you manage to add 86509 as blocks/depends-on issue? This is a trivial
circular dependency which IZ normally rejects.)

------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 09:49:31 +0000 
2008 -------
lla: 1.8.0?! from what museum is this? ;-)

Debian etch (~2 years old) has 1.12. Looking at archive.debian.org shows
that sarge even had 1.10, makes 1.8 being the woody version....

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to