To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97325
------- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 17 11:26:22 +0000 2008 ------- Might do. However, do I understand this correctly that the problem is BOOL which is typedef sal_Bool BOOL; an using directly a POD such as unsigned char instead would not give this warning? Theoretically, using BOOL is questionable anyway and works only if the type is capable of holding at least 8 bits.. which also isn't guaranteed for unsigned char. If the problem is the typedef then also using sal_uInt8 would not do and we have to use the approach the attached patch takes. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
