To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69635
------- Additional comments from erikanders...@openoffice.org Sun Dec 28 01:36:15 +0000 2008 ------- Given that OOo seems to handle the *contents* of XHTML files correctly (i.e. everything but the XHTML header, as noted above by batavus), it seems that OOo only needs to change how it handles this header, and then add the .xhtml extension to the list of openable filetypes, and therefore this bugfix should theoretically be exceedingly simple. Are there any devs following this issue that could give us a rough target milestone forecast? Would 3.2 be reasonable to hope for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
