To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89713
------- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 14:52:08 +0000 2009 ------- > @andreschnabel: I agree with you. Except for the point that the discussion > is > academic. It is vital that OOo has a well-defined interface. This very issue > shows that an unclear interface causes unnecessary fuss, late in the game. It caused fuss early in the game. in 3.0.0 beta. That you didn't do anything even as there was a patch available (which admittedly needed a small fix) is not my problem. It would have been a blocker for 3.0.0 already. So it's now one for 3.0.1. Wrt the stable interface you might be right, just move it to the sdk deb and we can get rid of the discussions, can we? Of course we can't do this 3.0.1 but for 3.1. > @rene: Just to make it clear: I am not going to invest into a clean > solution. Others might (ka?). ka doesn't even do his job of getting important OOO300 changes to DEV300, so no, I don't think he will do this. I would volunteer for moving it to the SDK deb (same dir, though), but that's all I would do. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
