To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
------- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 13 16:30:05 +0000 2009 ------- We need to fill in rdx on return of such a struct anyway Also when *passing in* such an entity we always in UNO pass the address of a struct, not the struct itself. So the foo in cpp2uno.cxx for measuring the size of a passed in struct is misguided, as that's for if it was passed by value, which never happens. We still have a bit of a problem wrt xmm0 xmm1 for the case of returning a struct of floats which is passed around either completely in xmm0/xmm1 or split between etc --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@porting.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@porting.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
