To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98240





------- Additional comments from npo...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 19 16:30:17 
+0000 2009 -------
hmm this looks familiar, does this really happen in upstream builds ? I saw this
( and fixed it ) in ooo-build and assumed it was due to a combination of
 
a) I changed the order of when basic gets loaded to access things early
b) an upstream change to SfxObjectShell::ImplGetSignatureState which calls
GetStorage() ( which you can see from the trace triggers delete of the stream (
later accessed which causes the core )

anyway here is my alternative patch - ( which prevents
SfxObjectShell::ImplGetSignatureState from doing any nastiness ) really though
SfxObjectShell::ImplGetSignatureState should never get called for an alien
document right? ( but belt and braces prevention here does no harm ) 

which is the right patch?, is either of them correct? the world of the object
shell etc. is a mystery to me, lets hope some wise person will make the right 
choice

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to