To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
------- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 3 20:53:25 +0000 2009 ------- @jl: I have prepared an about 100 line patch to replace the "package-directory- traversal" with XPackageManager.getDeployedPackages(), this seems to work such a way, that at PythonScriptProvider instantiation time, I only get to know the "Old package". However, this does not solve the problem, that the final hasByName() calls for the "new package" return false (see above sb's commend at the end) , because the PythonScriptProvider(PSP) is not informed about the change (no PSP.insertByName()/PSP.replaceByName() gets called and even the XModifyListener.modified() call of the packagemanager itself occurs after the hasByName() - Calls). How shall this work ? I do not yet attach the new implementation to this issue, as it needs more thouroughly testing. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
