To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3910
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 6 15:58:15 -0700 2005 ------- "None" does not seem like a good name for the new layout. It sounds like it has *no* layout at all, which makes no sense. Folks commenting on this issue seem to think that "single-sided" leads to confusion about how the document will be printed (e.g., you might want a "single-sided" layout but to print it duplex, or vice-versa). The key concept is that there should be a layout that is independent of the parity of the page number, in other words, not book-like. This will solve 90% of user complaints about this issue. I don't have any bright ideas for what name to call such a layout that will get that concept across. It could be named "default", as long as it were the default. The other 10% of us also want an option to suppress the insertion of blank pages (or one of the variations that have been suggested), even if we're using a book-oriented layout scheme. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
