To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99899
------- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 5 12:13:09 +0000 2009 ------- > We should not mix up two different things: The version of the package, and the > version of the files it contains. All packages containing oxt files have the > version 3.1.0, although probably no oxt file has this version. The same with > all IMHO that's a bug, too. But unfortunately many of the dicts (and that's what the oxt is you mean) have no clear version. If the SRB etc. would be packaged, i'd argue for them to carry the correct version, too. >our libraries. In my opinion the oxt file version should not influence the > package version, so that "3.1.0" is the only correct package version. The only content of this package *is* the oxt so it does not make sense to reflect its version. You would have liked it if I omitted the actual extension version in http://packages.debian.org/sid/openoffice.org-report-builder http://packages.debian.org/sid/openoffice.org-pdfimport etc.? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
