To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99862
User hdu changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
OS/Version|Windows XP |Windows, all
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|OOo 3.x |OOo 3.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 10 13:03:16 +0000
2009 -------
That is outstanding work! Thank you, Henner.
Retargeting this issue back to 3.2.
Waiting for a CWS based on >=DEV300_m43 (all the CTL-improvements from the
OOO310 branch will
get in there).
> Would it be safer to use fDiacritic and/or fZeroWidth flags instead?
The implementation trick that these glyphs usually have a zero-width doesn't
escape to the outside, so
it is good enough. It would be cleaner from the "interface vs. implementation"
perspective though. See
my OOoCon2008 talk about the Aqua port, where a lot of problems had their root
cause in ancient
implementation tricks having escaped and were used all over the place. E.g. the
graphics trick to use a
XOR raster operation to implement complex-polygon-clipping on platforms where
only polygon-
drawing is accelerated
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
