To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
------- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 13 16:18:55 +0000 2009 ------- @yarodin: For one, is this still reproducible with OOo 3.0.1 or recent OOO310 (heading towards OOo 3.1) or DEV300 (heading towards OOo 3.2) snapshots? (If not, chances are low anybody will want to invest time into this...) For another, I would at least need a stack trace (with symbols; no stripped libraries) to say anything about this issue. I have recently done builds of (CWS sb107 based on) DEV300m42 with a GCC 4.3.3 tool chain and run those OOo instances on a Debian unstable box without encountering any such SEGVs, so cannot reproduce this. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@porting.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@porting.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
