To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
------- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 18 09:30:22 +0000 2009 ------- >this will not help if one *has* to deploy oo via scrips. As I indicated earlier, the publisher of the extension decides if or if not someone must agree. The current feature only allows to 1.not display anything by not using this feature 2.display the license and enforce the "active" agreement The consequence of the latter case is that such extensions cannot be bundled, as said in the wiki. If one wanted something like #2 and additionally have the user leave the choice to skip the license, then this should be explicitly allowed by the publisher. But this feature does not exist (yet). If OOo wanted to ship a bundled extension with a license then it needs either - convince the publisher to remove the license - implement the needed feature and have extension developer adapt their extensions if needed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
