To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374


User es changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                 Summary|Changes to  Annotations vi|Changes to  Notes via UNO 
                        |a UNO API are not persiste|API are not persistent any
                        |nt anymore                |more
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Target milestone|---                       |OOo 3.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 10:54:34 +0000 
2009 -------
@MOD: your "looking into it...." comment...
- so it's not a regression from 3.0 -> 3.0.1?
- only happens when loading doc with "old" (<3.0) notes?
- only happens when modifying them via API.
So, as mux2005 explained, yes, it's a P2 due to the severity.
But because of our schedule and the general use of notes via API I'd still
target 3.2. (no showstopper)

(changed summary for later tracking "Annotations" -> "Notes")


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to