To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374
User es changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Summary|Changes to Annotations vi|Changes to Notes via UNO |a UNO API are not persiste|API are not persistent any |nt anymore |more -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 10:54:34 +0000 2009 ------- @MOD: your "looking into it...." comment... - so it's not a regression from 3.0 -> 3.0.1? - only happens when loading doc with "old" (<3.0) notes? - only happens when modifying them via API. So, as mux2005 explained, yes, it's a P2 due to the severity. But because of our schedule and the general use of notes via API I'd still target 3.2. (no showstopper) (changed summary for later tracking "Annotations" -> "Notes") --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org