To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100386
------- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 26 02:58:18 +0000 2009 ------- >es old stuff - and the oo-team still treats this wrong to my point of view ccheney should reopening this issue. I draw your attention to this old issue: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25795 TAB - as it is a character below ASCII Code 32 - needs to be treated as a control-code. This is correctly handled within the ODT-XML-file, where it is a tag. OO.o itself behaves tricky when overruling the expected behavior by treating this tag as a character - an in the case of OVERWRITING is becomes nasty. However, control-codes need to be protected from overwriting by accident. So the QA-team might closes this issue as a WONT because they can not handle it in an ISO-appropriate manner, but not as an INVALID, as in this case OO.o is behaving wrong. my 2cents Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
