To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100615
                 Issue #|100615
                 Summary|Data pilot macro create wrong number of fields (OO 3.1
                        |)
               Component|Spreadsheet
                 Version|1.0.0
                Platform|Other
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|programming
             Assigned to|spreadsheet
             Reported by|wagafo





------- Additional comments from wag...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 27 14:48:31 
+0000 2009 -------
I have a problem with the number of fields in a macro that creates a data pilot.
I've tried this in an empty sheet both with OO 2.4 under Linux (Ubuntu 9.04) and
OO 3.1 under Windows (XP), and the behavior is different. Here is the code:

Sub Try
    oDataP =
ThisComponent.getSheets().getByIndex(1).getDataPilotTables().createDataPilotDescriptor()

    oFields = oDataP.getDataPilotFields()
End Sub


With OO 2.4 in Linux Ubuntu 9.04 , oFields is an array with two elements, while
with OO 3.1 on Windows XP oFields has just one element.

Supposedly a data pilot is always created with two fields.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to