To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96490


User sba changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                Keywords|                          |needmoreinfo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Apr  8 13:36:24 +0000 
2009 -------
SBA->foobard: "Some" followeed by "First [...]" + "Second [...]" make a
so-called collective issue. these are invalid.

It is true that a "guessed" connection of different issues might help. But in
this case (word count, spell check and word selection and their interaction with
the break iterator) you must decide what scenario you want to be looked after in
this issue. Please write another issue for the other stuff, feel free to name
its ID here). And note that a better "before-after" description will be very
welcomed I don't even have a clue what language "pai\'sa" is from. But that is
an important part in the area "symbols and special chsars as part or seperator
of the words".
Thank you.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to