To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
------- Additional comments from paolo...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 15 19:53:47 +0000 2009 ------- Of course that file contain the most visible strings. Fixing it would mean to do the most of the job. However I checked and it seems even very few strings in helpcontent are affected. IMHO fixing the file you mention would be enough, we will then check and fix the remaining strings into pootle, so the next release (3.1.1? 3.2?) will be all OK. I miss all the work involved for this, but isn't just possible to extract the strings with a "grep-like" process? False positives will be just ignored by us while editing the file. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@l10n.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
