To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101178
User rene changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |INVALID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Sun Apr 19 14:24:24 +0000
2009 -------
INVALID.
why? because in the first actual existing call to PKG_CHECK_MODULES
pkg-config is searched:
checking which libwpd to use... internal
checking whether freetype is available... checking for pkg-config...
/usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for freetype2 >= 2.0 ... yes
checking FREETYPE_CFLAGS... -I/usr/include/freetype2
checking FREETYPE_LIBS... -lfreetype -lz
checking for FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden in -lfreetype... yes
checking which libxslt to use... internal
is what I get here?
Did you by chance do a autoreconf / aclocal call? Don't, it apparenly
gets in some PKG_CHECK_MODULES which changes behaviour.
(If you want to regenerate configure, just use autoconf)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
