To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95907
------- Additional comments from cor...@openoffice.org Tue May 12 10:43:57 +0000 2009 ------- Dear od, I have already given my clear criticism of the definitive design flaw above. Specifically that it complete breaks backwards compatability between versions of OOo. Interoperability between MSO should take a backseat to interoperability between OOo versions. This relates to my post on Feb 19 and the specification items 2.1, 2.2.1, and 2.3. Do not mis-understand that we are unappreciative of the fact that this is a largely volunteer, community based project. None-the-less when the "Community" experiences a complete and UN-forewarned restructuring of their existing document layouts, there will certainly be an outcry. At least I am trying to be humorous, when what I really want to do is go cry in my soup. Especially when my soup is going to be very cold by September 2009. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
