To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12891
User mba changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|requirements |mba
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue type|ENHANCEMENT |DEFECT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.x
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu May 14 11:01:19 +0000
2009 -------
This issue has a lot of duplicates and I agree that the inconsistency with other
applications as well as the "surprising" implementation deserve an
investigation. I agree that this has to be treated as a defect. That does not
mean that it isn't one, but it's either correct behavior (and so it should be
"WONTFIX") or it's rubbish (and then it's a defect).
So I've set the target to "3.x" and grabbed the issue. I would be pleased to get
an explanation why Writer does behave that way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
