To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18004
User mba changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Priority|P5 |P3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 12 09:34:38 +0000 2009 ------- I think the priority has no meaning at all - the number of duplicates makes this an important requirement. That's the reason why it has target "3.x". That gives it a much higher probability of getting implemented than an issues with Prio 3 but target "OOoLater". But to avoid confusions I agree that Prio 3 is better. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org