To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101980
User aw changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|STARTED |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |FIXED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 24 12:23:15 +0000 2009 ------- AW: It's used in SwContourCache::ContourRect to create a TextRanger; not sure what this is doing, but it seems not necessary for the loaded document. It could be done on demand. Surely TextRanger and interacting with B2DPolyPolygons may be also optimized. Checked: TextRanger is in SVX and internally uses PolyPolygon (the old polygon). Checking the conversion... Ah, here is the problem. TextRanger::TextRanger converts the B2DPolyPolygon to a PolyPolygon, inserting all sub-polygons. The possible sub-polygon count in the old PolyPolygon is a USHORT, allowing 65535 sub-polygons. This is a potential problem, writing a FUp-task (#i103068#). For OOo 3.1.1, the problem is solved with the changes done. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org