To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102773





------- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 10:15:31 +0000 
2009 -------
I have performed my investigation under Microsoft Windows 2003 Server on
dual-core AMD processor with 16GB RAM. The memory footprint will vary from
system to system. But from my point of view that is not the point.

The general memory footprint for the given document is high, because of all the
large embedded PNG graphics. For another document of a similar size on the file
system the memory footprint can be larger or smaller - it depends on the
content. But this is no defect from my point of view.

The defects which I got from the description are
- the memory consumed by a certain document is not released after closing it
- the same document consumes much more memory in OOo 3.1+ than in former version
of OOo
I did not reproduce these defects - that is what I want to show with my
investigation results.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to