To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102920


User erack changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|NEW                       |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Resolution|                          |FIXED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from er...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 17 20:04:42 +0000 
2009 -------
In cws locales32:

revision 275072
i18npool/inc/xdictionary.hxx
i18npool/source/breakiterator/breakiteratorImpl.cxx
i18npool/source/breakiterator/breakiterator_cjk.cxx
i18npool/source/breakiterator/xdictionary.cxx

Also adapted local iterateCodePoints() in breakiteratorImpl.cxx to cope with
surrogates at text end. Use OUString::iterateCodePoints() in
BreakIterator_CJK::getLineBreak()

I actually have no idea if and how surrogates could be handled with the
gendict dictionary.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@l10n.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to