To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104417
                 Issue #|104417
                 Summary|webdav NTLMv2 support
               Component|ucb
                 Version|OOo 3.1
                Platform|Unknown
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|ENHANCEMENT
                Priority|P4
            Subcomponent|code
             Assigned to|mhu
             Reported by|unordained





------- Additional comments from unordai...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 18:09:07 
+0000 2009 -------
3.1.0 provides working NTLM support (thank you), as measured against jCIFS's
NtlmHttpServlet. Switching to JESPA's NtlmHttpServlet (which adds support for
NTLMv2, because of Vista/IE8 switching to disallowing NTLMv1) seems to work fine
with IE6-8 and Firefox on XP and Vista, but breaks OOo 3.1's NTLM. It will
attempt to log in, but JESPA then logs an error server-side and throws a 403: 

java.io.IOException: Not a Type 1 message.
 at jcifs.ntlmssp.Type1Message.parse(Type1Message.java:232)
 at jcifs.ntlmssp.Type1Message.<init>(Type1Message.java:88)
 at 
jespa.ntlm.NtlmSecurityProvider.acceptSecContext(NtlmSecurityProvider.java:944)
 at jespa.http.HttpSecurityService.doAuthenticate(HttpSecurityService.java:680)
 at jespa.http.HttpSecurityService.doFilter(HttpSecurityService.java:772)

It looks to me like the updated version of "neon" may be attempting NTLMv2, but
not implementing it correctly. (If you google for this error, one possible fix
involves apache forwarding REMOTE_PORT -- this happens with and without this
option, and with and without apache in front of tomcat. Doesn't seem to be the
same situation.) 

I can't tell from neon's mailing lists if they intended to have NTLMv2 or not --
there are some subversion commits related to it, at least. 

Also, in the 3.0 source, neon appears as a simple library and the version number
was easy to determine and cross-reference; in the 3.1 source, it looks like the
neon code is directly copied into OOo? Is it being maintained separately? I was
trying to figure out what version 3.1 included, so I could match it against the
neon changelog.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ucb.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@ucb.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to