To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104778


User fs changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED               |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Resolution|                          |WONTFIX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Sep  4 09:16:09 +0000 
2009 -------
Base does not require Java. Using the built-in HSQLDB engine requires Java. Or
using a JDBC driver requires Java.

Also, Accessibility support requires Java. The Web/Letter/Agenda/Fax wizards
require Java. Some part of the help backend implementation require Java. Parts
of the production registration is implemented in Java. Parts of the mail merge
functionality require Java.

A lot of extensions meanwhile require Java.

Besides all this, which invalidates the premise, implementing an own Java VM
(and this is how I understand this suggestion) is neither feasible nor
necessary. Nor would it make sense if OOo came with its own internal Java VM
which cannot be used by other applications on the same machine.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to