To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100127
------- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 7 08:40:25 +0000 2009 ------- As for the patches done to boost: Most of them are because of some "foo hides foo" warning of GCC, i.e. if you have a method argument named the same way like a class member. Then, #elif was not recognized by some compilers (actually, I am not completely sure whether this still holds for the compilers currently used, or whether I just took those chunks from the old patch). BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG - no idea why this was added, this is definitely from the old patch, too. The patch to function_base.hpp was since otherwise some files do not compile on Windows. The patch was taken from some side I found by googling this problem, I suppose this really is a bug in boost. The patch to function_template.hpp indeed catches a bug in boost, you can see from just looking at the unpatched file that it cannot compile if BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS is set, unless you add the patch. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@util.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@util.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
