To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85306


User mav changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
             Assigned to|ab                        |mav
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Status|STARTED                   |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Target milestone|OOo 3.3                   |OOo 3.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Sep  8 06:39:20 +0000 
2009 -------
The problem should be now workarounded in cws encsig09. The check is not done
any more, instead the signature is always checked on storing. This workaround of
course affects the performance ( only in case a document with signed macros is
stored, normal documents are not affected ), but while deciding between
performance and correctness the correctness should win.

Changing the title accordingly. The fix for the mentioned problem is still
important to have the mentioned above optimization. A successor issue 104876 is
opened for this. Taking this issue over.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to