To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98907


User aw changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
        Target milestone|OOo 3.2                   |OOo 3.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Tue Sep  8 11:56:09 +0000 
2009 -------
AW: Made a direct comparison (side-by-side) of DEV300m29(a) (no primitives) and
m54(b). Rough measurements (counting).

Scrolling in activated mode: (a) 53s, (b) 10s. Much faster, visualisation much
better (a does simply show Harilines, that visualisation is wrong)

Scrolling deactivated mode: 3s both non-AAed, with AA (b) needs 4s

Activation AAed: 17S (a), 25s (b). Without AA, (b) activates in 14s.

Deactivation takes much longer in (a), full 4min 5s. In (b) we get 27s for AAed,
25 for non-AAed.

The initial statement, moving the legend in an activated chart, takes 20s in
(a), but only 11s in AAed (b) and only 8s in non-AAed (b).

Thus, all in all, we already got a good speedup, and remarkably low costs for AA
activation. Still keeping open, but moving to 3.3 (and removing from aw077).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to