To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105217
------- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 20 14:58:39 +0000 2009 ------- > Sub-component "programming" means Macros, Basic, API and so on in OOo. > Not "to-dos for the programmers" I see. Could you please update the subcomponent description accordingly? Currently it is too general: "Use this component if the feature/enhancement is mainly related to programming tasks." > But it remains that you address the *wrong* problem here. I understand. Several people (according to their comments) have been under the impression that issues were indeed "forgotten". Good to hear this is not the case. Maybe the problem is that, apart from a "OOo Later" target there is no indication that issues have been or will be re-evaluated according to the criteria in the well-known "why_all_issues_are_equal" document you mention. P.S. I tried to increase objectivity by creating a query for the given criteria, but failed: The query would run forever and time out as the criteria became more complex (e.g. using regex for the number of CC listeners). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
