To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105385
                 Issue #|105385
                 Summary|search not in order of text but of memory
               Component|Word processor
                 Version|OOo 3.1.1
                Platform|Macintosh
                     URL|
              OS/Version|Mac OS X
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|code
             Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm
             Reported by|iwtpoo





------- Additional comments from iwt...@openoffice.org Sat Sep 26 15:42:38 
+0000 2009 -------
If you mark 2 consecutive texts with an identical character to search for, it 
first finds the upper one, than 
the lower one, that is in the order of the text. 
If you exchange the order of both texts, OO will first find the character in 
the lower text, than in the 
upper one. 
Obviously OO does not search in the order of the text (as the user would accept 
and even assume), but in 
the internal object memory order of OO. 
This is a bug, not just an enhancement. Earlier I noticed a similar effect with 
new footnotes between other 
footnotes. It is confusing for the user. Please correct that bug asap. Thanks  !

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to