To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
------- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 21 09:31:47 +0000 2009 ------- > There is no special webdav UCP, we have the same UCP for webdav and http. Yes, but it is in a source directory called "webdav" and many of its source files have a "webdav" prefix, so I tend to call it "the webdav UCP" ;) > if this patch has the consequence that the UCP itself decides > on whether locking should be applied or not, this might explain > the observed behavior That probably is what is going on. I *think* that when I worked on making the patch "work" in the 3.0 timeframe, I wasn't even fully aware that it indeed is used also for plain http , which was of course a bit of failure from my side. > can you explain what your comment "a disaster" means? It means that the more time I spend staring in my editor or the debugger at the code touched and added by the patch, the less I understand it, and the more convinced I am that it "works" by accident;) > Could you please attach the "current reincarnation of kendy's > patch" to this issue. Sure, it's no secret, in a public git repo and all, so I'll attach it below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ucb.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@ucb.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
