To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47541
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 02:25:02 -0700 2005 ------- > You might be onto something about multi-threading. The machine is a quad-3Ghz > server. I disabled hyper-threading (which makes the machine obviously look > like an 8way to Linux) and it still failed. This time however, I did get it > to physically crash and report some information. Can you attach gdb to OO.o and get a more detailed stack trace ? that'd perhaps be helpful. > If they are holding fixes for NLD until 2.0.1, we probably will just revert > OOo back to the regular file manager which seems to work much better in > these later milestones. Up-stream is just not committing a fix to osl_Condition [ which is that it can't be waited on with a timeout reliably ;-], it shouldn't cause a crasher, although I can well believe it causes your problem. Of course, that fix was in our m79 builds, and will be in our 2.0.0 final builds. They percieve the fix as risky / cf. the bug. Anyhow - if you want a build that works well on NLD, it's prolly best grabbing the latest (sourrce) release of ooo-build, and giving it a go. Failing that we'll have packages of an m92 release on red-carpet.go-oo.org in the next few days DV. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
