To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107423





------- Additional comments from swei...@openoffice.org Mon Dec  7 19:38:33 
+0000 2009 -------
@fl:

Given the Sort Range dialog was intended to cover only cases when a user selects
just the columns or row headers, as you think, the current implementation is
*NOT* OK. Because then, the dialog shouldn´t show up in case of Screenshot #1
and not in case of Screenshot #2 (see attached files). Consequently, there
should be filed an issue for this bug, that was introduced with #60401.

But definitely, what you think, is not what the spec is saying! (Which disturbs
me a little, since you are listed as the Specification Author.)

We find ourselves in a weird situation now:

There is issue #60401. A spec was created for it. The solution of #60401 does
not fulfill the spec, because it does not cover all the cases that are
applicable to the spec. In order to complete the implementation and in order to
accord with the spec we have issue #107423. But now, it is stated that the spec
as well as the current implementation cover even more cases than were initially
intended.

So, the spec does not express, what was actually meant? And, the solution of
#60401 does neither comply with the spec nor with the actual intentions? How
crazy is that? ;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to