To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104109


User es changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|'ccheney,jbfaure'         |'ccheney,es,jbfaure'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 17 22:14:03 +0000 
2009 -------
I stumbled upon this issue again...

The point on the UX list was that we exceptionally have - thanks usage tracking
- an idea of what "the users" do without *pretending* knowing with black magic
what they do.

Once you admit - an you'll have to because it's not an opinion but it's a fact -
that there is much more use of the the Stylist than of the full screen, I ask
myself what can be the impact of removing the shortcut of a well known function
to give it to an unused function...

I do understand the need of consistency and so on but in this case this change
would be blind bureaucracy: fulfilling system requirements ignoring users
requirements.

Please forget this idea.

Plus if you stay by the proposal on comment desc3, it's wrong: F4 in Writer is
used for the database browser. Maybe your system catches F4 somewhere...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ui.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@ui.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to