To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74304
User pescetti changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'mechtilde,pescetti' |'ddozza,mechtilde,pescetti
| |'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from pesce...@openoffice.org Sun Dec 20 13:22:05
+0000 2009 -------
We should share some more details maybe, but the fundamental reasoning flaw is
in the original post: there is (as of now, late 2009) NOTHING derived from LPPL
files in the Italian hyphenation patterns, because the author of the file
originally licensed under LPPL accepted to relicense it under LGPL. This was
done under guidance from the Italian N-L project. And, as I understand it, this
closes the issue by removing the root cause.
The file README_hyph_it_IT.txt in the shipped dict-it.oxt says "Based on the TeX
hyphenation tables by Claudio Beccari". This is probably the file that you
erroneously assume to be under LPPL. Look for it on CTAN then and see for
yourself that it isn't licensed under LPPL any longer, but under LGPL.
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/language/hyphenation/ithyph.tex (in case links
in issue 75287 do not work for you)
So: no LPPL, no LPPL violation.
I actually believe that http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75287
explained it all, but I hope things are clear now.
About your initiative of e-mailing authors, I would find more efficient to
discuss this kind of issues in appropriate mailing list and to delegate the N-L
leads, who might have better knowledge in some cases. Anyway, please CC the
Italian N-L Project Leads listed in
http://projects.openoffice.org/native-lang.html for any communication you will
have with authors: if we made something wrong, we would like to be informed
about it.
If you believe you are still right, of course we can continue our discussion,
but I will need precise details since everything I was able to find so far
confirms my opinion that this issue is obsolete and should just be closed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
