To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107803


User hdu changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
             Assigned to|sba                       |hdu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Component|framework                 |gsl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Ever confirmed|                          |1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED               |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              OS/Version|Linux                     |Unix, X11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              QA contact|iss...@framework          |iss...@gsl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Summary|Not all faces of loaded TT|Not all styles of the Pigi
                        |F font are  available and |arniq are  available
                        |none of the OTF           |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Subcomponent|ui                        |code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Target milestone|---                       |OOo 3.x
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 09:30:04 +0000 
2009 -------
Confirming on OOo32rc1. Haven't looked too deeply into the problem, but I 
noticed that three of the five 
Pigiarniq styles have their SubFamily name in the NAME-3.1-subtable as 
"Regular", whereas their 
counterparts in the NAME-1.0-subtable and in their PreferedSubfamily name are 
correct: "Regular", 
"Light" and "Heavy". I guess these families were copied and modified and some 
style bits were left 
unmodified too. This can result in them being considered to be duplicate font 
faces... so it looks like the 
problem may lie in the fonts themselves. On the other hand OOo should try to 
behave the same on all 
platforms.

The OTF-thing is a duplicate to issue 43029 which has been implemented for 
OOo32.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to