To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108560
User sb changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 22 14:02:43 +0000
2010 -------
Looks good. The only suspicious thing is that "static StringHashTableImpl
aImpl(1024);" in rtl_str_hash_get is not thread-safe, which, however, it also
need not be, as its only use in rtl_ustring_intern_internal is guarded by
pPoolMutex. Maybe documenting the declaration of rtl_str_hash_get as not
thread-safe would be good.
@cmc: If you do not have any CWS handy, I can put this onto my pile of patches
for OOo 3.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@porting.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@porting.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
