To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107834


User hdu changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
     IssuesThisDependsOn|                          |100611
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Assigned to|hdu                       |od
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 15 16:12:24 +0000 
2010 -------
Here is what is happening: An obsolete heuristic (see issue 100611 for details) 
triggers for some 
scenarios. Now Writer tries to use a different font and like Caolan already 
described the attribute bits can 
get lost during this process. Refreshing them to the attributes original 
request makes very much sense.

Getting rid of the whole if-branch which tries to use a different font than the 
requested font would make 
even more sense. This has been so at least since bitmap-fonts and nine-pin 
printers with builtin-fonts-
only got out of fashion.

@od: using the uming.ttc helped me to reproduce the problem here. I copied it 
into your shared folder.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to