To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65943





------- Additional comments from coll...@openoffice.org Wed Mar  3 21:50:33 
+0000 2010 -------
as of OOo 3.2 this is still here.

summary: boolean should default to 2 state for those of us who are simpletons;
also null should not be represented as a half-check.

assuming i am not misunderstanding this issue..

call me oldfashioned but i still think the boolean needs to default to 2 state.

if i need the three state behavior i should select it when defining the base
table field or have some preference defined to select 2 or 3 state for bool
(still default of 2 please).

****

null rant() {
i can understand the value of the null (user has not specified a choice) 
but as i just spent an hour confused 
because i forgot about 3 state and then furthermore 
because the 3rd state (null) appears to be represented by 'half-a-check' 
which i of course read as a display error of a full check and so 
interpreted as a 'true' which is of course is not..

yes i know (high impedance low voltage, low voltage, high voltage); but you
could just as easily also attribute measurements for electron orbital states 
and mangetoresistance properties and get way more than 2 states along that
argument...but that doesnt make it more understandable to program with.

}



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to