To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109939
------- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 8 21:08:46 +0000 2010 ------- @sb: All the listener containers/multiplexers (see UnoControl's maFooListeners members) use the osl-mutex, as they're based on ::cppu::OInterfaceContainerHelper. So, at least this containers assumes that the osl mutex is used for thread safety. So, I assume replacing the osl mutex usage with solar mutex usage would technically work, but potentially lead to other, perhaps more subtle problems. Also, I don't really like the idea of paving UnoControl and derivees with SolarMutex locks. SolarMutex usage is kind of transitive, so it would propagate itself to e.g. form controls immediately. At some point, this renders multi-threading useless. In the current situation, where the SM is used only where needed (and in UnoControl::draw, it obviously is strictly needed), we have a few deadlocks now and then (rarely nowadays, really), but don't infest everything with the SM pest. A state which I'd prefer. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
